The first two records are activation candidates. This is stronger than a vague demo but weaker than production cryptographic issuance. That honesty is part of the trust design.
| Receipt | Type | Status | Prepared | Public claim | Verify |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLENA-RR-0001 | Refusal receipt | Activation candidate | 2026-05-11 | Candidate refusal record for cases where human-authorship evidence is insufficient. | Verify |
| PLENA-HAP-0001 | Human authorship provenance | Activation candidate | 2026-05-11 | Candidate founder authorship-provenance record for one selected writing project. | Verify |
The record exists on the public PLENA site with an ID, page, JSON file, QR target, and hash manifest route.
It does not claim court admissibility, insurer approval, government recognition, standards adoption, or production cryptographic signing.
Founder final review, declaration, redaction, preservation, public hash listing, and deployment confirmation.