PlenaProof should not replace Microsoft, ServiceNow, IBM, Workday, Salesforce, Okta, Jira, DocuSign, or GRC tools. It should record proof around their actions.
PlenaProof should be the portable proof layer beside enterprise systems that already own identity, workflow, security, procurement, records, and GRC.
| Enterprise system | What it may already do | PLENA output |
|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview / Entra | Data governance, identity, compliance, permissions | Data-boundary receipt and authority-basis proof |
| ServiceNow | Tickets, incidents, workflows, enterprise service management | Ticket-to-receipt timeline and incident evidence packet |
| IBM watsonx.governance / AI governance tools | AI inventory, risks, policies, model governance | Control-evidence binder and portable verification record |
| Workday / HRIS | HR records and people workflows | Human-review receipt for high-impact employee decisions |
| Salesforce / CRM | Customer records and service interactions | Customer dispute evidence packet and correction trail |
| DocuSign / CLM | Contracts and signatures | Contract decision receipt and vendor proof packet |
| Jira / GitHub | Engineering tickets, pull requests, releases | Change-approval receipt and deployment proof packet |
| OneTrust / Archer / GRC | Risk controls and compliance workflows | Control-evidence export with verification-ready attachments |
Use “roadmap,” “implementation phase,” “pilot connector,” or “API-ready design” unless the connector is actually built and tested. This protects PlenaProof from overclaiming.